WebDAV NFS Comparison: The Differences we want to know

We have analysed WebDAV with many other server based software or protocols, and such one is NFS or the Network File System. This is much like WebDAV as it also a client which lets the user view and also store files from any remote computers or PCs.

Even as NFS server has built along a generation of versions to run its services, it, however, cannot provide the security as an HTTP protocol server-based client can. And thereby, here we are having a detailed analysis of the WebDAV NFS Comparison.

WebDAV NFS Comparison

WebDAV NFS Comparison: All about these Two that needs to be discussed

Now NFS could be a potential alternative to WebDAV, but it only runs in the Linux or Unix based OS. Thereby making it a distributed File System. So if these systems are added later on then they will most likely require additional modules which will be required to be added onto the OS.

Though the NFSc4 trend to be quite secure on untrusted networks, most of the versions can only be implemented on the Local Area Network System. Making it most likely to be in a single network module.  As for WebDAV, much it is pretty much optimised for every type of OS and can work for both local and cloud-based wider area networks.

As for using the port 80 for unencrypted access and port 443 for secure access of the file. This allows easy movement for files which can be copied, edited or deleted as the user’s wishes.

As for version control systems, WebDAV allows numerous VCS such as Subversion, Git, and PVCS through it. The talk about the WebDAV NFS Comparison between these two will be much likely to be one-sided. Now on a side note, when the security  of NFS is questioned then

NFS doesn’t have authentication, but you can limit the hosts that can connect. Both don’t support encryption, which doesn’t seam like it would matter in your case. NFS does have higher performance because it doesn’t have to send authentication each time it goes to send a file.

If both machines are Linux based and you don’t care about auth/encrypt then go with NFS

MassNodes, Client, LowEndTalk

So we do get to know that WebDAV beats NFS in terms of security. However, the only similarity between these two will be that both of these protocols require additional DroboApps and also some kernel modules to publish files from the 5N.

The Final Key Differences

In a clear state of Mind, WebDAV is what the mass requires, rather than using  OS-based distributed File systems. This has also been proved in another of our articles like the SMB WebDV Comparison. And much like SMB, NFS has also been created with an equal number of differences when compared to WebDAV. So here is the WebDAV NFS Comparison.

  • SMB is much faster in Local Area Networks than compared to WebDAV when the file is being sent over throughout  Linux based OS.
  • Even if NFS seems to be faster, in LAN  it cannot outperform WebDAV when it needs to be switched over to the different OS. Forget outperform, it cannot even perform in a different OS.
  • When compared to the NFS or its new versions like NFSv3 or NFSv4, it seems WebDAV is still superior in the area of file -accessing on high latency networks.
  • As for the security factor, it can be seen as a clear fact that HTTPS is more secure and is being used in all new web-based servers or websites. Giving WebDAV clients the security they require over other sources or network protocols.

Click this link to learn more about WebDAV Alternatives <–