WebDAV SMB Comparison: A Complete Showdown

SMB or the Server Message Block has been around for quite some time, this is also known as the Common Internet File System or CIFS.  This web server protocol is mostly used by Windows and it in a way very different to that of WebDAV and thereby, here is a quick WebDAV SMB Comparison

WebDAV SMB Comparison: So what is this all about?

As discussed above, CIFS is a specific form or version of SMB, version 1. So whenever  Microsft wants to disable their support for the client, it is very likely that this client would stop running or working. And because of this, the implementation of CIFS is very risky or we may say it to be very vulnerable to a lot of security problems mentioned in Microsoft’s blog post. And that is the reason why most people have been recommended to use WebDAV in the type of situations or places where these risks like this cannot be made and are considered unacceptable.

WebDAV SMB Comparison

This is because WebDAV uses HTTP for file transferring and since it follows the HTTP protocol, thereby it is designed to be more secure in accordance with the real-time web browsers. As HTTP protocol is the one which is used in all web-browsers, it also includes HTTPS which ensures the security and encryption nature of the HTTP.

This means that no other user can have access to the user’s file. As this secure File transferring sever can also bypass many proxies and other companies firewall. This can be said to be a must-go for all. As for  SMB, while it can be a tab bit faster but it lacks security and reliability when compared to what WebDAV offers.

SMB is a “real” file sharing tool. It supports low-level file locking and shareing management and the network redirector in Windows ensure that the applications are able to interrace with the file directly

-FulGan,arstechnica

Anyway, it is also to be noted that WebDAV offers a very easy medium for the devices to access data shares from anywhere using the same URL. This is because users can put it on the  SSL to protect the credentials and encrypt the stream. In addition to this, WebDAV also uses NTFS permissions so as to limit and take a look at what a user can see or do.

The Duel of WebDAV vs SMB

From the article that we have discussed, it can be clearly seen that WebDAV has always had the upper hand over SMB, however, if you want to note down the differences between these over some bullet points, here’s what we have for you. A full rundown of WebDAV SMB Comparison.

WebDAV vs SMB

  • In comparison to the new versions of SMB like Ver2 or ver 3, it seems WebDAV is still superior in the area of file -accessing on high latency networks. This is a significant lead as it poses great importance, due to the fact that more deployments are being done in AWS S3 or some other public cloud.
  • As for low latency or local networks WebDAV losses to the performance of SMB v3.1.1.
  • Now when the thing is about file transferring, it is a known fact that WebDAV can only limit the file transferring of 4GB. So in those cases, instead of both SMB and WebDAV, something like FTP would have to be used.

Now according to news from Microsoft, as it has the ability to stop the support of any SMB clients. It is likely to be a good option to leverage the support of some new libraries. But even though this goes on, integrating them would still be a big project. And thereby it has been a better idea to end the  CIFS support and recommend WebDAV for all use cases requiring to mount a shared drive via WebDAV.

To learn more about amazing facts about WebDAV facts, go to WebDAV Alternatives.